View Single Post
Old January 23, 2013, 09:16 PM   #367
Al Norris
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,318
As of 5 minutes ago, Alan Gura had not filed. He has until midnight.

Quote:
01/23/2013 62 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellants Illinois State Rifle Association and Mary E. Shepard in 12-1788 Attorney Charles J. Cooper to DEFENDANTS-APPELLEES' PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC. [62][6458851] [12-1788, 12-1269] (Cooper, Charles)
I'm reading it now. Here's a look at the TOC:

Quote:
I. THE PANEL DECISION’S HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ACCORDS WITH HELLER AND SEVENTH CIRCUIT PRECEDENT AND DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH DECISIONS OF OTHER CIRCUITS.
A. The Panel Decision Comports with Circuit Doctrine.
B. The Panel Decision Does Not Conflict with Decisions from Other Circuits.
II. THE SCRUTINY APPLIED BY THE PANEL DOES NOT CONFLICT WITH SEVENTH CIRCUIT PRECEDENT OR THE DECISIONS OF OTHER CIRCUITS
A. The Panel Decision Comports with Circuit Doctrine.
B. The State Bears the Burden of Proof.
C. No Remand for a Trial on Legislative Facts Is Needed.
CONCLUSION
The PDF is 18 pages.
Attached Files
File Type: pdf CA7-Shepard Response In Opposition.pdf (139.7 KB, 26 views)
__________________
National listings of the Current 2A Cases.
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04430 seconds with 8 queries