Originally Posted by Xfire68
Made little to no sense and what the heck does "traditional lawful purposes like self-defense within the home." mean?
The antis have adopted the view that the Heller
decisions ONLY affirmed a right to keep a firearm in the home for self defense, that the RKBA does not extend beyond the front door "because the Supreme Court said so."
This is another one where, if the lie is repeated often enough, it becomes accepted as truth. That's what they are telling the fence-sitters out there, and if we don't refute the lie each and every time it is uttered, the vast numbers of the undecided will very soon accept that view as the truth, and we'll have a VERY difficult time then changing their opinion.