View Single Post
Old January 23, 2013, 12:28 AM   #13
vranasaurus
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 16, 2008
Posts: 1,175
Tom is right on with criminal liability. Why does everyone recommend doing things based upon an ability to prove who yourself innocent. Last I checked the government was required to prove you guilty.

As for civil liabilty:

In order to recover for negligence the plaintiff must prove duty, breach, cause, and harm.

What duty do you have to prevent a gun you sell from subsequently, and unbeknownst to you, ending up in a third party's hands? Not only do you not have a duty it would be impossible for you to do. If you don't have a duty you can't be liable.

Further, the acts of the person you sold it to would likely be a superseding/intervening cause that would break the chain of causation from you.

Now if you live in a state that has universal background checks and you sell a gun without doing one you may be both criminally and civilly liable. But even in this case civil liability depends on the ability to prove causation.
vranasaurus is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.05452 seconds with 7 queries