View Single Post
Old January 20, 2013, 02:47 PM   #2
Romeo 33 Delta
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 27, 2009
Posts: 313
I'm with you on this one. From my understanding of Miller, Chief Justice McReynolds made it clear that the "arms" mentioned in the 2nd Amendment were those which had a MILITARY/MILITIA UTILITY. That certainly applies to the AR and AK platforms as well as FALs, H-K/"G" clones, M1As, mini-14s/30s and a host of others.

Maybe someone with standing can sue NY for "infringement" ... that wold be a hoot!
Romeo 33 Delta is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04751 seconds with 7 queries