View Single Post
Old January 17, 2013, 10:46 PM   #3
MLeake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
Al, you are countering a priority argument with a chronology argument. Apples and oranges. It could be argued that the revision may have been about organizing by priority and not chronology; or, it could be happenstance.

I don't know, but in this instance your concise argument requires supplemental reading for me to figure out if you are correct...
MLeake is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04135 seconds with 7 queries