View Single Post
Old January 16, 2013, 01:06 PM   #56
armoredman
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: Arizona
Posts: 3,822
Uncle Teddy tried that "body armor piercing" angle once before, and specifically referenced 30-30 ammo, IIRC.
If they case it off the oldest and weakest standard of armor, the old level IIA, then it would restrict a HUGE amount of ammo. If the standard was set up to Interceptor or steel armor, there would still be large numbers of calibers restricted, and forget getting anything to feed your Barret L-82...if you had the bucks to buy one, you lucky skunk, you.
Yes, this could be very bad, even if they restricted it to only ammo designed specifically to go through armor, as it has been for quite some time.
__________________
http://czfirearms.us/ same original CZForum, new location.
armoredman is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04538 seconds with 7 queries