View Single Post
Old December 1, 2012, 10:29 AM   #10
Bart B.
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Posts: 3,877
Ah, yes, again the issue arises. . .full length sizing versus any other way.

Before I make further posts on this thread, I first want to know what the OP's accuracy objectives are. For example, consider these two scenarios with the same set of components (case, primer, powder and bullet):

One is, you shoot ten 5-shot groups testing your reloads made with process and tools in method A and the groups range from 1/10 moa to 8/10ths moa.

The other is, you shoot ten 5-shot groups testing your reloads made with process and tools in method B and the groups range from 1/10 moa to 5/10ths moa.

That's 50 shots testing both methods comprising different tools and methods. Statistically, an excellent test.

Which tool and process method meets your accuracy objectives?

Note this thread has a close relative at:

http://thefiringline.com/forums/show....php?p=5306276

Last edited by Bart B.; December 1, 2012 at 11:01 AM.
Bart B. is online now  
 
Page generated in 0.04039 seconds with 7 queries