Thread: 1903 ?
View Single Post
Old November 17, 2012, 09:50 AM   #5
krinko
Member
 
Join Date: August 1, 2009
Posts: 62
Considering that some of the early Springfield receivers shattered when hit with a hammer blow, it is unlikely anyone would have been able to add a "1" to a low serial number.
To me, a 1913 barrel on a 1939 receiver isn't anything to amaze---the 1903 rifle has to be the king of parts swapping, or at least the co-regent with the Garand.
-----krinko
krinko is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04816 seconds with 7 queries