Originally Posted by TailGator
Choosing not to promote firearms as not the same as overtly opposing firearm ownership.
And their position is a long way from simply "choosing not to promote firearms."
WWP does not co-brand, create cause marketing campaigns or receive a percentage or a portion of proceeds from companies in which the product or message is sexual, political or religious in nature, or from alcohol or firearms companies.
They will not accept donations from firearms companies or even appear on a firearms-based radio show to promote themselves!
That position is, IMO, much
closer to "overtly opposing firearms ownership" than it is to "choosing not to promote firearms".
Still happily answering to the call-sign Peetza.
The problem, as you so eloquently put it, is choice.
He is no fool who gives what he can not keep to gain what he can not lose.
-Jim Eliott, paraphrasing Philip Henry.