View Single Post
Old November 10, 2012, 01:02 AM   #82
Senior Member
Join Date: December 20, 2007
Location: S.E. Minnesota
Posts: 4,245
Actually, he just exploited the "sporting purpose" clause in 18 U.S.C. 925(d)(3)
I'm surprised nobody has challenged that clause yet, based on U.S. v. Miller (1939)
"The only way to stop a bad guy with a gun is with a good guy with a gun"
zxcvbob is offline  
Page generated in 0.03452 seconds with 7 queries