View Single Post
Old October 14, 2012, 08:39 AM   #5
Beretta686
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 11, 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 723
Quote:
There are also semi .50's, and these are vastly different. The sideplates are thicker so the FA parts can't be inserted into the receiver, the internals are thinner, and the trigger mechanism is entirely different.
He's exactly right. Though they're cosmetically similar & share some parts (barrels, tripods, etc), I'd think of them as two separate guns due to BATF regulations. The same way the semi versions of open-bolt machine guns are all closed-bolt.

To add in my totally unasked for opinion, having shot quite a few MGs on the government dime and having played with a few semi-auto belt-feds on my own dime, I have no idea why anyone would want one. They're expensive to feed, of dubious utility & practical accuracy and lack the coolness of full-auto. But if they float your boat and you have the $$$......
__________________
"Our contract called for 16 cases of rifles and ammunition for $10,000 dollars, not a machine gun...........That is our present to the General"-Pike Bishop

When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.”
Beretta686 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04497 seconds with 7 queries