View Single Post
Old September 24, 2012, 06:40 AM   #34
stnosc
Member
 
Join Date: September 13, 2012
Posts: 41
Quote:
This is an oft repeated myth based on hearsay, and conjecture, that has in fact, been debunked in this thread and others - see my post on this topic. While this is true for 308, it is NOT true for 223 - LC are not materially and consistently any less volume than commercial. In fact the opposite may be true in many cases: see the chart and look for LC06 - they held the most.
http://thefiringline.com/forums/atta...4&d=1336880187
Thanks for stating that. I saw at least two posts on this thread about military brass vs. commercial brass thickness that were based on urban legend.

An just to reiterate, here's a chart:



http://www.6mmbr.com/223Rem.html

Last edited by stnosc; September 24, 2012 at 06:47 AM.
stnosc is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.05934 seconds with 7 queries