View Single Post
Old September 12, 2012, 12:59 PM   #64
Join Date: March 17, 2012
Posts: 32
There were two distinct differences with regard to questioning.

When judges wanted to question Gura they used hypothetical situations and reducto ad absurdum questions. When the judges questioned the states attorney, they used facts and case law.

I found that to be most interesting of all.
SilverBulletZ06 is offline  
Page generated in 0.03167 seconds with 7 queries