Furthermore, I've heard that the District has a policy of not allowing zoning to a business for the purpose of dealing in firearms. In fact, the address listed on the VPC's FFL is zoned for “residential/limited non-profit,” with no mention of a retail or business license.
One would think that a formal letter to the BATFE setting forth the facts of their location not being zoned for business, along with noting that it does not appear that they actually conduct business as a FFL would cause some interest, hopefully sufficient to force a revocation of their FFL. Laws ought to be applied evenly. None of the "unwashed" could get a FFL without zoning and business license requirements being met, or having business hours stated for the conduct of the business that the license was issued to allow.