You do realize that this is precisely what Mr. Enos did? Still, and yet, the BATFE refuses to allow him to buy or possess any firearm.
I thought that was what he did but I did not see a separate argument stressing there was no conviction under Lautenberg. Perhaps I missed it in my quick run through or there may be reasons unknown to me why it is not more forcefully stressed. I also do not mean sound over critical. It is a good brief.