Originally Posted by KyJim
That does raise a question. On page 10, paragraph 6, the brief states a state judge ruled that each of the plaintiffs "were entitled to have their pleas withdrawn and the case dismissed." If this is the case, I would think there is no conviction which is required by Lautenberg.
You do realize that this is precisely what Mr. Enos did? Still, and yet, the BATFE refuses to allow him to buy or possess any firearm.