View Single Post
Old May 22, 2012, 08:58 AM   #111
Al Norris
Staff
 
Join Date: June 29, 2000
Location: Rupert, Idaho
Posts: 9,307
This case is still dragging on:
Quote:
05/21/2012 182 MOTION by Defendants Richard M Daley, The City of Chicago to stay , MOTION by Defendants Richard M Daley, The City of Chicago for extension of time to file response/reply (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - C, # 2 Exhibit D - H)(Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 05/21/2012)

05/21/2012 183 NOTICE of Motion by Andrew W Worseck for presentment of motion to stay,, motion for extension of time to file response/reply, 182 before Honorable Edmond E. Chang on 5/24/2012 at 08:30 AM. (Worseck, Andrew) (Entered: 05/21/2012)
The 6 page motion (linked above) is to (1) stay the proceedings until after Moore and Shepard are decided, or in the alternative, (2) extend time to file from May 28th to June 29th.

Oh, and it's signed by:

Quote:
/s/ Andrew Worseck
One of Its Attorneys
Is this an Illinois thing? That's twice now that we've seen this.
Al Norris is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.05146 seconds with 7 queries