True, but your statement was that the SR40c was "far more suitable for cc."
If the sole criterion is comfort, sure.
In that sense, my 442 is "far more suitable."
But since I carry because of the very slim chance that I might actually be forced to employ the weapon, I prefer something larger (when feasible).
My point being, "far more suitable" was too broad, and implied that other factors didn't matter.
Perhaps if you had read the OP's first signature line. I stand by my initial assertion that the 1911 is not well suited for CC, especially when he already owns a SR40c in an effective caliber and is far better suited for CC.