rts99, in his response, Mr. Gura has answered (and refuted) each and every claim made by the AG in his Motion to Stay. He did this in the 10 pages allotted by Judge Legg.
His brief was clear, concise and to the point. No more and certainly, no less. He laid bare the real reasons for the State wanting the stay. Judge Legg can certainly read between the lines, as you have.
Up next? The
April May 23rd reply brief by the State and then we will await what the Judge has decided.
Meanwhile, the appeals timetable marches on.
ETA: Thanks, Maestro!