Originally Posted by rts99
...I am puzzled that Gura's brief didn't state the obvious: that the state's argument is based on fear and fear alone. The Supreme Court specifically ruled in McDonald that the second amendment could not be singled out for "specially unfavorable treatment"....
Because that line of argument isn't helpful or proper in this brief dealing with this issue, the stay.
Alan Gura is a well trained and highly skilled lawyer and knows what he's doing. This latest brief of his is a model of clarity and brevity.