Originally Posted by Al Norris
Oh, did I forget to mention that § 925 is not being funded? Get your application for relief of firearms disability, fill it out and send it in (with the required fee) and after a couple or three weeks, it will be returned to you (along with your uncashed check). A nice letter will accompany the return telling you that the program is not being funded by the Congress, so they can't even reject the application. It is merely returned.
The upshot of this, is that the Courts have already ruled that since the application was not denied, you don't have a claim before the court.
The case was UNITED STATES v. BEAN 537 U.S. 71 (2002).
I addressed this HERE
literally years ago and got ZERO response from the members of this board. I still haven't found anyone willing to carry this thing forward. There is just no interest.
I originally addressed it HERE
. Note the number of responses -- zero -- even though 92 members read the thread.
Gun Control: The premise that a woman found in an alley, raped and strangled with her own pantyhose, is morally superior to allowing that same woman to defend her life with a firearm.
"Science is built up with facts, as a house is with stones. But a collection of facts is no more a science than a heap of stones is a house." - Jules Henri Poincare
"Three thousand people died on Sept. 11 because eight pilots were killed"
-- former Northwest Airlines pilot Stephen Luckey