Join Date: December 4, 1999
Location: WA, the ever blue state
I handload; 19 Badger,.222, .223, 22-250, 6mmBR, .243, 25acp, 25/35, 250/3000, 257 Robert Ackley Improved, 260Rem, 6.5x55, 270, 7x57mm, 7mm Rem mag, 32acp, 32sw, 32S&WLong, 32-20, 7.62x25mm, 30-30, 303Sav, 300Sav, 7.62x39mm, 308, 7.5Swiss, 30-06, 300WM, 303Brit,7.62x54R, 8x57mm, 338WM, .380, 9x19mm, 9x23mm, 357 Sig, 38 sp, 357 mag, 38sw, 40sw, 10mm, 10.4mm, 401 power mag, 44mag, 45acp, 45Colt, .410, 45/70, and 12 ga.
In 2011, I hunted with;
12 ga factory ammo [got a greater sage-grouse, the 747 of the bird world]
22 short rimfire factory ammo [shot a couple 18 pound raccoons]
22LR rimfire factory ammo [ shot an 18 pound raccoon]
45/70 handloads [ missed a raccoon]
223 handloads [missed a few white tailed deer]
7mmRemMag handloads. [ got a mule deer and an antelope]
What brass did I hunt with?
Rem or Win, what ever is lying around.
The word 'forum" does not mean "not criticizing books."
"Ad hominem fallacy" is not the same as point by point criticism of books. If you bought the book, and believe it all, it may FEEL like an ad hominem attack, but you might strive to accept other points of view may exist.
Are we a nation of competing ideas, or a nation of forced conformity of thought?