View Single Post
Old January 14, 2012, 05:21 PM   #15
MLeake
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 15, 2007
Location: Outside KC, MO
Posts: 10,128
thallub, I understand that.

However, if you actually read Section 930, it says that for general federal facilities, the rules are not intended to infringe on possession for hunting or other lawful purposes.

Licensed concealed carry for personal protection is generally found to be a lawful purpose, so, the way this section reads, even if there are signs, they are not allowed to infringe on lawful purposes, outside the buildings.

I'm curious to see if anybody can point to any actual appellate level case law on this.

Edit: I also understand this has been a major bone of contention at VA facilities, but I don't know of any cases that have actually gone forward, just threats by VA security to press charges.

Again, does anybody know of any appellate case law?
MLeake is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03910 seconds with 7 queries