She is ignoring the "... to any other place where he or she may lawfully possess and carry it..." clause also.
This all may well be intentional and, if it is, I applaud the mans courage. It is exactly the same as refusing to move to the back of the bus, IMHO. Both are refusals to abdicate civil rights, no more, no less.
However, if he thought he was *protected* by FOPA as a matter of normal application of the law, he's wrong. It simply defies common sense to assert that a stop of several days duration counts as an incidental stop on the way to some other destination.