View Single Post
Old December 12, 2011, 03:44 PM   #18
K_Mac
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 15, 2010
Posts: 470
Quote:
People seem to be confusing de facto negligence with criminal or culpable negligence. Dropping a gun, and trying to catch said gun, is negligent in a sense. But how do you establish mens rea with regard to a poor reflex action?
Mens rea my foot. Endangering safety does not require criminal intent. Negligent is as negligent does.

Edit: I think actus reus is the relevant statute.
__________________
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." Benjamin Franklin

"If you let "need" be a requirement and Government be the arbiter of that "need", then Liberty is as dead as King Tut." Jimbob86

Last edited by K_Mac; December 12, 2011 at 03:51 PM.
K_Mac is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04559 seconds with 7 queries