View Single Post
Old September 15, 2011, 11:05 AM   #75
C0untZer0
Junior member
 
Join Date: April 21, 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,555
I read through the 2A thread and the Kachalsky, but I don't know what this means ^

It seems like Kachalsky case for the time being has gone against us, and the State of IL is trying to reference it in the Moore case and Jensen is saying Kachalski doesn't apply to Moore v Madigan?

Last edited by C0untZer0; September 15, 2011 at 11:13 AM.
C0untZer0 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04215 seconds with 7 queries