View Single Post
Old August 19, 2011, 04:27 AM   #38
Senior Member
Join Date: December 13, 2006
Location: Body: Clarkston, Washington. Soul: LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,551
Ok, going over this again, just because I'm having a discussion here atwork about this subject. Curious about this:

Aaron countered with a Motion to Dismiss that claim, with prejudice (filed on 04-25-2011).

This is a good counter move, as Aaron points out that the Idaho Statutes do not allow the Government to charge for defenses on civil complaints in matters of first impression.
On 05-11-2011, the Judge denied Aaron's MTD.
So Aaron will be required to pay the government despite the statutes in place?
- Jon
Disequilibrium facilitates accommodation.
9mm vs .45 ACP? The answer is .429
WeedWacker is offline  
Page generated in 0.03296 seconds with 7 queries