View Single Post
Old October 19, 2010, 10:40 PM   #9
Aguila Blanca
Senior Member
 
Join Date: September 25, 2008
Location: CONUS
Posts: 5,943
44 AMP -

That's a rather marginal improvement, isn't it? Suppose the potential term HAD been on the books as more than a year at the time. This guy paid a fairly small fine and served NO time in prison. He was such a dangerous individual that he went directly from the incident to serve honorably in the defense of the country, and for FORTY YEARS since the incident he has led a clean life.

How would your proposed amendment in any way make it right, ethical or moral for this man to be deprived (actually, "stripped") of his RKBA?
Aguila Blanca is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04427 seconds with 7 queries