I do have to wonder what happened to this judge in the weeks that passed since the first motion for preliminary injunction. It's as if it's not even the same judge.
She went from cautioning the defendants that in the "very very near future" that injury could occur, etc.. . . to this.
I smell a rat. Either someone's had a talk with her, or she is setting up the case to fail in a higher court. As of now, my money's on the former.
Perhaps I should have expected this, but I am disappointed. When does the amendment finally mean what the frig it says?