The decision refusing the TRO was a very interesting read. I liked the judge's comment that the City's supposed safety concern with firearms being transported to firing ranges in the city doesn't wash, because if people go from the city to ranges outside the city they still have to transport their firearms!
I wonder what the odds are that Gura can dissuade the judge from his current position that intermediate scrutiny applies in this case. Still, it's fairly apparent that the judge doesn't think the City's range ban is a reasonable time/place/manner restriction, since it doesn't spell out where or in what manner a shooting range can legally be located in the city.
Thanks for keeping us informed about this, Al!