Gee - what people should do is take this as a starting point and move through the electoral process to change it by throwing the bums out.
Let people follow the law and be safe and protect themselves and then propose less restrictions. That has worked elsewhere.
I fail to see why folks don't think the new law is a substantial tactical defeat for the Chicago paradigm of no guns that can be used as a stepping stone.
Or is it better to want all the cake at once and then get none?