right to defend property with lethal force
I am sorry, but this is where we likely will have to "agree to disagree" The right to defend "possessions" with lethal force does not agree with most State's laws, and my moral limits.
WITHOUT Freedom of Thought, there can be no such Thing as Wisdom; and no such Thing as public Liberty, without Freedom of Speech. Silence Dogood
Does not morality imply the last clear chance? - WildAlaska -