We could get into another argument over exactly what kind of "arms" are protected by the 2nd Amendment here. Hopefully we can limit this discussion to "portable firearms" and not crew-served weaponry or artillery/RPG type weapons.
I'm for that, Bill.
On Pax's old site (Armed Citizen), now gone forever, we discussed, with regularity, whether the intent of the 2A was to put restrictions on anything at all.
Discussions involving tactical nuclear weapons that could be stored under our beds was a regular feature with heated opinions on both sides of the argument. Hey, for the record, I was opposed to the individual nuclear weapons interpretation, and drew the line at having my own M1 Abrahms.