View Single Post
Old October 16, 2008, 09:16 AM   #8
grymster2007
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 22, 2007
Location: In the oak studded hills near Napa
Posts: 2,203
Akin’s automatic “bump-fire” device is certainly ingenious in that it circumvents the “single pull” concept, but I’m shocked that he actually expected something other than what he’s getting from the courts. I (unlike WA) did not read much past the complaint and the defendant’s motion to dismiss, but I don’t remember seeing if or how many of the devices were actually sold. If some were sold, what happens to the poor schmucks that bought them?
__________________
grym
grymster2007 is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.03950 seconds with 7 queries