View Single Post
Old August 10, 2008, 01:20 PM   #38
SAWBONES
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 17, 1999
Location: The third dimension
Posts: 662
Oh no. Not another thread degenerating into a "point shooting vs. sighted shooting" argument.

Both are necessary. It's not either-or but both-and.

Quote:
It has been proven over and over again that sighted fire is superior to unsighted fire.
Bunko.
The point (obvious pun) is to get adequately-accurate and adequately-fast hits on target, on a life-threatening adversary, at relatively close range. Point shooting does this faster, in hands that know how to accomplish it, faster than sighted shooting.
At longer distances, sighted shooting excels point shooting for accuracy, no doubt about it, but that isn't the condition under discussion here.
__________________
"Humani nihil alienum"
SAWBONES is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04776 seconds with 7 queries