View Single Post
Old July 6, 2008, 07:04 PM   #35
LanceOregon
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 10, 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 2,774
I have to agree with RsqVet here, this doesn't make much sense at all.

Why accept the transfer of a gun that is so obviously the wrong product?

All he had to do was to simply not fill out all the paperwork and not pay his transfer fee and background check, and the gun would have still been the property of Ed Brown and still legally new merchandise. Case closed.

This story just doesn't add up in my book.

.
LanceOregon is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04761 seconds with 7 queries