View Single Post
Old April 17, 2008, 07:37 AM   #43
RR
Member
 
Join Date: June 29, 1999
Posts: 85
"This is begging the question. If the shooting was clearly about protecting life then there's obviously no need for an expert witness."

John I cannot follow your line of thought here. Not even a little.

When a civilian intentionally shoots someone, why else would they have fired except for to protect life or property. Intense dislike? Target practice? The victim voted for Hillary? Sorry, can't follow what you are saying John.
RR is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04565 seconds with 7 queries