View Single Post
Old February 3, 2008, 12:07 AM   #13
mykeal
Senior Member
 
Join Date: October 8, 2006
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 2,760
What I meant was, I did not like how it looked. It's one man's opinion, just as was the statement,
Quote:
that is one nice looking gun.
.

One guy said he liked it, and one guy said he didn't. No panties in a wad, no rant, and no lack of clarity.

I didn't say I hated it, I didn't say it was ugly, or an abomination, or, as I was once told by a marshal at a rendevous, "Get the H... out of here with that crap!" And I didn't say it was not historically correct (as if that somehow makes it appealing).

I thought I was being rather nice in apologizing for not expressing a positive response about something I personally don't find appealing.

CraigC - were there really cartridge converted Patersons in the 1870's? I learn something new every day.
mykeal is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04755 seconds with 7 queries