View Single Post
Old December 17, 1999, 04:37 PM   #12
sundog
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 22, 1999
Location: Green Country, OK
Posts: 730
paul, have you seen anything from these guys slower than 4895? a cast load is not necessarily 'reduced' just because of a slower moving lead bullet. it's a cast load. the characteristics of a given set of components will dictate its development. i think you will agree that anyone who does not understand the reduced load concept should stay with published data. again, a good read on this is richard lee's reloading book. this is a good thread. anyone who is willing to do a little work to find a good cast load will be justly rewarded. lyman's cast load book is good, although it has many of the same loads as the 47th, but it does include alot of other data. sundog

------------------
safety first
sundog is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04163 seconds with 7 queries