View Single Post
Old May 22, 2005, 07:42 PM   #11
FrankDrebin
Junior member
 
Join Date: May 21, 2004
Posts: 1,101
Quote:
On our dept. this is authorized only if Garner VS. Tennessee applies (deadly force/fleeing felon law),
Interesting factoid (not to nitpick): TN V. Garner was a civil case, not criminal. You may get fired in MI for violation of department policy for shooting a fleeing felon who poses no immediate threat, but you can't be prosecuted under state law, and I've never seen anyone prosecuted under federal law in MI for shooting a fleeing felon. Same goes for civilians. I wouldn't want to pay the civil suit for shooting an unarmed 15 year-old who was running away after trying to break into your car, but you won't be prosecuted by the state. Many in MI think it's against "the law" to shoot a fleeing felon who doesn't pose an immediate threat to their life. It isn't. It's just not a wise thing to do for many reasons. Laws in other states may vary. Just thought you might find Michigan's take on it to be interesting.
FrankDrebin is offline  
 
Page generated in 0.04428 seconds with 7 queries