View Full Version : Ruger m77??
April 13, 2007, 05:13 PM
What are the opinions on the ruger M77Hawkeye-Mark 2
Personal exsperince only please....
Mark 2 or Hawykeye?
What the difference?
Are any other bolt actions reccomended(Secondary to the first question please)
April 13, 2007, 05:37 PM
I have found the original M77 to be a great rifle. The new Hawkeye is supposed to have a edited - there is no adjustable trigger.
April 13, 2007, 06:49 PM
Whats it adjust down to do you know?
April 13, 2007, 07:56 PM
I don't know
April 13, 2007, 08:27 PM
I have a Hawkeye in .30-06 and the trigger is NOT adjustable. It is very crisp, but will need to be lightened for target applications. GUN TESTS magazine reviewed the .223 Hawkeye and was very pleased, averaging 1.2 inch groups@100 yards with Black Hills 60 grain JSP. The trigger on these guns seems to be breaking between 4-5 pounds, not bad for hunting.
April 13, 2007, 08:51 PM
Thanks Bottom Rung for clearing that up.
April 14, 2007, 03:52 PM
Does anyone know what the Trigger adjusts down to(not Hawkeye)
This would be a target rifle and im stick between this and a Rem 700 SPS
April 14, 2007, 04:53 PM
I think that for purely target applications the Remington 700 is a better gun because the trigger can be adjusted and they have a reputation for being very very accurate.
If it were a hunting rifle i would say right off the bat that the Ruger is a better gun because you cant beat CRF actions.
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.