PDA

View Full Version : Browning Gold Hunter vs Remiington 11-87 Premier


BoneDigger
September 11, 2006, 10:03 AM
I can get a used Browning Grade 1 Gold Hunter for $550, in 99.9% condition, still in box, only fired 75 rounds.

Or...

I can buy a new Remington 11-87 premier for $650 (including tax).

I want to shoot skeet, doves, turkeys, and deer (buckshot). Is either of these guns any better than the other. The Browning has the warranty card inside, so it is basically like new. I am leaning toward the Browning, but need advice...

Todd

Clayfish
September 11, 2006, 12:33 PM
Get the Browning. It's a much nider gun than the 11-87. If the warranty card is still in the box then you get the warranty so it's like getting a new gun all together. Don't get me wrong the 11-87 is a good gun, but it's not as nice as the Browning. I've seen used Browning golds for as low as $500 but if you get the box and the warranty I think that's a great deal.

HSMITH
September 12, 2006, 05:43 AM
That is a no-brainer to me. The Gold is the one I would take.

IMO a brand new 11-87 is a $300-350 gun, and no more.

Logs
September 12, 2006, 06:09 AM
You will be much happier with the Browing and it will hold its value better. GO GOLD....

DOCSpanky
September 12, 2006, 07:34 AM
BROWNING, THE BEST THERE IS!

They say that cause its true. The Remington is a VERY GOOD gun, but the Browning is the GREAT GUN they compared it too;)

DOC

rev214
September 12, 2006, 07:55 AM
Browning!