The Firing Line Forums

Go Back   The Firing Line Forums > The Conference Center > General Discussion Forum

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old March 7, 2008, 07:01 PM   #1
Caeser23
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 19, 2006
Posts: 242
What's gonna be the next big thing in firearms?

we've came along way since the 1700s with muskets and black power firearms, rilfe barrles, to break action, lever action, clip fed, magazine fed, belt fed, closed bolt, open bolt, striker fired, rotating barrel. i'm most certainly missing ingenuities, this is what came to mind right now.

the new futureweapons the other day had a knights armament m4 that fired from the closed bolt in semi and open bolt in full auto (same gun not swapping anything) have we reached the limits yet? or what else is in store for us?
Caeser23 is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 07:04 PM   #2
Rant Casey
Senior Member
 
Join Date: March 7, 2008
Location: AZ
Posts: 441
All the rage in the future - Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range
Rant Casey is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 08:56 PM   #3
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
Probably changes to what gets launched downrange. Personally I think projectiles in general are pretty archaic and hard to control properly.
chris in va is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 09:14 PM   #4
ActivShootr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2007
Posts: 1,040
A big thing is already upon us. The gun uses electromagnetism to launch projectiles. Pretty neat.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AEu9LLQpOF8
ActivShootr is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 09:24 PM   #5
chris in va
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 26, 2004
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 13,806
I'm pretty sure Metal Storm still uses propellant. They're just stacked in the barrels, and electronically fired.

However the Navy is running tests on an electromagnetic gun that just launches a needle shaped projectile hundreds of miles.

http://www.popsci.com/scitech/articl...gnetic-railgun
chris in va is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 09:35 PM   #6
ActivShootr
Senior Member
 
Join Date: August 15, 2007
Posts: 1,040
Thats some pretty awesome firepower Chris. Imagine hundreds of 40lb slugs raining down.
ActivShootr is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 09:46 PM   #7
kozak6
Senior Member
 
Join Date: June 17, 2005
Location: AZ
Posts: 3,113
I wonder if caseless rounds might ever make a comeback.

Burst firing weapons that have a cyclic rate so high that the gun fires off the burst before it recoils, such as the H&K G11 (incedentally also caseless) or the Russian AN-94.

There's also lots of room for various sorts of directed energy weapons. The military is working on a microwave gun for riot control, and then lasers and so forth.
kozak6 is offline  
Old March 7, 2008, 10:38 PM   #8
toybox99615
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 9, 2007
Location: Kodiak Alaska
Posts: 767
case-less rounds

I see an opening for some bright company to develop a case-less round for small arms. At the price of ammo today as compared to ten years ago it might be profitable.

Technically a case-less round it not hard to conceive. Given the technology now available for electronic ignition. But selling it depends on how the price compares to other rounds. Case-less rounds near the prices of reloading your own might be very marketable. Case-less rounds at higher than brass cartridge rounds probably would only selll as a novelty and never get popular.
toybox99615 is offline  
Old March 8, 2008, 03:08 AM   #9
Crosshair
Senior Member
 
Join Date: December 16, 2004
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 5,333
A non-AK gun that doesn't use those dent magnets known as AR-15 magazines.
__________________
I don't carry a gun to go looking for trouble, I carry a gun in case trouble finds me.
Crosshair is offline  
Old March 8, 2008, 04:19 AM   #10
darrentxs
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 5, 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 401
I was thinking of a military weapon that would be cool. Not sure how it could be built. It works by using a sighting sytem that marks targets and keeps track of them even if they move.

A sniper could mark a whole mess of BGs and call in a strike. A remote multi-barreled weapon would take them out all at once. The projectiles would home in on the marks. It's a tough nut to crack in design but I like the idea.
__________________
Happy Trails to You
darrentxs is offline  
Old March 8, 2008, 05:45 AM   #11
Curtis(USAF)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 3, 2008
Posts: 241
Laser guidance? I heard about something kind of like that. I'd say it would require about a 1-2 inch barrel diameter. The shells would require deployable flight surfaces, a laser detector, and some awesome internal computer processing power. I don't think its possible quite yet, but the military is getting there.

Of course, wire guidance could potentially be alot simpler. 25mm TOW bullet anyone? Aim at your target, keep the crosshairs on the impact point, and the bullet goes where you want it to go.

CCIP (Continously computed impact point) technology is coming along way. The scope is slaved to a laser range finder, and a fistful of sensors that crunch environmental factors such as elevation, air density, moisture, and so forth. The cartridges physical and ballistic characteristics are already figured into the computer, (Several different types of loads can be stored.) The scope automatically adjusts to keep the crosshairs on the point of computed point of impact. Utilizing the onboard computer, additional factors could be factored in, to adjust the aimpoint for target movement, much the same way world war two submariners would figure out the course and speed of enemy ships in order to put their torpedos where they needed to be. As you speed up the computer, you get more range and heading "marks" making the system more accurate.

As far as shotguns go, I'd see some more specialized loads coming into being. I hear that the people at Taser are finishing up development of a Taser slug for shotguns. Better range then a regular taser, no wires to break or fail, and the ability to engage multiple targets in rapid succession with less then lethal force. I'd also like to see more magazine fed shotguns. They don't have to be semi auto, but I prefer mag fed weapons.

As far as handguns go, I don't really know. More 'safe gun' nonsense? More calibers to answer questions that weren't asked? The FN 57 does kind of strike me as a nifty caliber. Not a lot of pistols can boast about being able to carry 20 rounds per standard size magazine. I'd kind of like to see the caliber take off, but I don't think it will unless some ones' military or police force just happens to adopt it out of thin air. (Doubtful, everyone seems quite content with 9mm for now) I can imagine environmentalists pushing ammo manufacturers to produce more lead-free ammo. Thats about it for now.
Curtis(USAF) is offline  
Old March 8, 2008, 01:16 PM   #12
bushidomosquito
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 14, 2007
Location: Kansas City
Posts: 434
Handguns, like cellphones, will get smaller and more compact. More plastic will be used in places you wouldn't think possible. Someone might start tinkering with adding various electronics, lights and lasers built in at first. LED sights instead of tritium seems possible and sensors to change one or more sight dot colors to indicate empty mag/last round in chamber, empty chamber, out of battery, ect. An ammo counter like the one on the Aliens gun isn't too far fetched. All you need is a sensor to read how far the follower is moved up the mag tube and a display in the sight recticle.
bushidomosquito is offline  
Old March 8, 2008, 03:13 PM   #13
homefires
Senior Member
 
Join Date: July 8, 2007
Location: Deming New Mexico
Posts: 1,495
Cyber ammo programed to complete numeros task at hand!

Already at hand is projectiles that can burst about someones hiding hole and whack them!

If that is not good enough? Try this!:barf:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7YjJ7...eature=related

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8qX0N...eature=related
homefires is offline  
Old March 10, 2008, 01:16 PM   #14
RedneckFur
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 14, 2007
Location: Central NC
Posts: 1,424
I'm afraid of the day they put circuts and electronics in guns. If my revolver jammed as often as my computer crashed, I'd be in one heck of a mess!

As far as developments go, I think we've gone plenty far. I'd like to see more work done with alloys and polymers.
RedneckFur is offline  
Old March 10, 2008, 03:43 PM   #15
Alakar
Member
 
Join Date: July 27, 2006
Posts: 67
Liquid propellant guns. Looks like most of the research is in artillery, but would be interesting as a personal firearm propellant.

http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Chamber/2838/arms.html

Quote:
Next is the idea of liquid propellant rounds. If you store the bullet in one magazine and the propellant as liquid in another, then you can load a round into the firing chamber, seep the proper amount of propellant behind it, and fire. The advantage of this technique is ammo capacities get even bigger (now you need store only the bullet itself), and liquid propellants combust more thoroughly than solids, producing greater pressure and higher muzzle velocities. Of course the disadvantage to this is that bottle of propellant on your weapon (one unlucky shot and boom!), but this can be gotten around by making a binary propellant mixture (a compound requiring two separate components which are individually inert but can mix to form your volatile propellant charge).
Alakar is offline  
Old March 10, 2008, 09:12 PM   #16
SteelJM1
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 1, 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHTF
All the rage in the future - Phased plasma rifle in the 40-watt range
Hey, just what you see, pal.
SteelJM1 is offline  
Old March 11, 2008, 05:39 AM   #17
Double Naught Spy
Senior Member
 
Join Date: January 8, 2001
Location: Forestburg, Montague Cnty, TX
Posts: 12,793
Quote:
A big thing is already upon us. The gun uses electromagnetism to launch projectiles. Pretty neat.
Quote:
I'm pretty sure Metal Storm still uses propellant. They're just stacked in the barrels, and electronically fired.

However the Navy is running tests on an electromagnetic gun that just launches a needle shaped projectile hundreds of miles.
While rail guns appear to be in our future, they are in our past and the tested concept is rather old. Back in 1936, a rail gun was displayed at the Texas State Fair that was designed by a fellow in east Texas. It was actually a rail machinegun and had a rate of fire around 300-400 rpm. It was also an apparent power hog and did not catch on with the US or with the Japanese who were negotiating a contract at the time.

It was in Modern Mechanix in 1934...
http://blog.modernmechanix.com/mags/...d_rail_gun.jpg
Attached Images
File Type: jpg med_rail_gun.jpg (61.6 KB, 42 views)
Double Naught Spy is offline  
Old September 25, 2009, 06:38 AM   #18
PhoenixConflagration
Senior Member
 
Join Date: November 6, 2008
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 517
As for handguns

I think more in our immediate future may be new advances in recoil and noise management. Is there some better way to control recoil other than a spring? Perhaps the next John Browning can figure that one out.

It would also be nice to see some way to fire the projectile without the need for hearing protection. Compact rail guns may be a long way off, but perhaps some mechanical way to control the release of gasses without a long baffle tube.
PhoenixConflagration is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 08:06 AM   #19
Martin_tu
Junior Member
 
Join Date: June 18, 2006
Location: Johannesburg; South Africa
Posts: 4
Next big thing?

Prohibition?

LOL!
Martin_tu is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 08:21 AM   #20
jgcoastie
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 15, 2009
Location: Kodiak, Alaska
Posts: 2,118
Quote:
Prohibition?

LOL!
Not a good attempt a humor, especially given the political climate in the U.S. and abroad...
jgcoastie is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 01:59 PM   #21
raindog
Member
 
Join Date: August 29, 2009
Posts: 69
Small mouseguns seem all the rage. I think Walther is releasing something soon to compete with Kahr, Ruger LCP, etc. (besides their PPK)

More people are carrying concealed, so I think you'll see more smaller guns.

.380 seems more popular, given the smaller guns, so it wouldn't surprise me if you don't seem someone launching .380 +P loads or something.
raindog is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 02:19 PM   #22
(BH)
Senior Member
 
Join Date: April 15, 2009
Location: East TN
Posts: 638
Tesla's Death Ray. Duh....
(BH) is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 02:20 PM   #23
Jim March
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 14, 1999
Location: Pittsburg, CA, USA
Posts: 7,417
Quote:
If my revolver jammed as often as my computer crashed, I'd be in one heck of a mess!
I'll be running "Ubuntu: Bangthing Edition"

__________________
Jim March
Jim March is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 03:08 PM   #24
Chris_B
Senior Member
 
Join Date: February 9, 2007
Posts: 3,101
Chris_B is offline  
Old September 26, 2009, 03:39 PM   #25
Brian Pfleuger
Moderator Emeritus
 
Join Date: June 25, 2008
Location: Austin, CO
Posts: 19,694
I think that electronic ignition will be the next major change. It already exists in actual production on a couple of commercially available firearms. I think it's just a matter of time before it's standard equipment. When that happens we'll be talking about the 9v battery shortage instead of the primer shortage.
__________________
https://ecommercearms.com
I am the owner/operator! Ask me for custom prices!
No sales tax outside CO!
Brian Pfleuger is offline  
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
This site and contents, including all posts, Copyright © 1998-2025 S.W.A.T. Magazine
Copyright Complaints: Please direct DMCA Takedown Notices to the registered agent: thefiringline.com
Page generated in 0.08618 seconds with 8 queries